Sri Lanka, a country that once boasted of its economic and political stability, has now been reduced to a pathetic state of bankruptcy and economic turmoil. As the nation celebrated its 75th independence anniversary, many citizens were anything but celebratory, with widespread anger, anxiety, and frustration palpable in the air. The country’s cash-strapped government, led by President Ranil Wickremesinghe, struggled to provide the simplest of essential services, including fuel, medicine, and food, leaving citizens reeling in the face of a severe economic crisis.
“We have reached the point of destruction,” Wickremesinghe acknowledged in a televised speech, sentiments that echoed the sentiments of many in the country. The president’s words were a stark admission of the nation’s dire state, a reality that had become all too evident in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemic, which had wreaked havoc across the globe, had left Sri Lanka in a precarious position, with its economy severely compromised and its people reeling in its aftermath.
Despite the challenges, Wickremesinghe’s government pressed on with an Independence Day celebration, a move that was met with widespread criticism from citizens and activists alike. Buddhist and Christian clergy, including prominent monks and priests, called for a boycott of the celebrations, citing the wasteful expenditure of public funds in a time of severe economic hardship. “It’s a crime and waste,” said Catholic priest Rev Cyril Gamini, while Buddhist monk Rev Omalpe Sobitha declared, “There is no reason to celebrate; it’s just an exhibition of weapons made in other countries.”
Sri Lanka’s economic crisis had reached a point where even the government’s own institutions were struggling. The country’s total foreign debt exceeded $51 billion, with nearly seven billion dollars in foreign debt due this year pending the outcome of talks with the International Monetary Fund. The debt, which Wickremesinghe’s government had inherited, had been accrued over decades, exacerbated by corruption, mismanagement, and a lack of transparency.
The economic crisis had, unsurprisingly, taken a toll on citizens, who were reeling under the weight of acute shortages, power cuts, and rising taxes. The government’s decision to increase income taxes sharply had been seen as a desperate measure to stem the bleeding, and it had only served to further alienate citizens from the political leadership. The military, once swollen to over 200,000 members, was also being downsized by nearly half by 2030, a move seen as a belated but necessary step towards fiscal discipline.
As the country struggled to come to terms with its new reality, activists began a silent protest in the capital, condemning the government’s independence celebration and failure to ease the economic burden. The protest, a poignant reminder of the nation’s desperation, highlighted the harsh realities facing Sri Lanka, a country that had once been hailed as a beacon of stability in the region.
The 75th independence anniversary celebration, which had been anticipated with such fanfare, had ultimately descended into chaos, a testament to the nation’s economic and political travails. As Wickremesinghe led the parade of soldiers, military equipment, and naval vessels, the country’s people remained skeptical, their eyes fixed on the uncertain future that lay ahead.
In the end, Sri Lanka’s independence celebration had become a hollow ritual, a reminder of the nation’s failure to address its fundamental problems. As the country struggled to find a way out of its economic quagmire, one truth had become crystal clear: Sri Lanka’s independence was no longer an occasion for jubilation, but a stark reminder of the country’s precarious state of affairs.